California Law and Ethics Practice Exam

Based on the case of Truman v. Thomas, what must a mental health professional disclose?

1. The benefits of outpatient therapy

2. The risks of not undergoing a recommended procedure

3. The personal history of their practice

4. The treatment options available

The correct answer is: The risks of not undergoing a recommended procedure

In the context of the Truman v. Thomas case, the appropriate disclosure by a mental health professional involves communicating the risks of not undergoing a recommended procedure. This principle is grounded in the concept of informed consent, which requires that clients are fully aware of the potential consequences of declining treatment or procedures that could significantly affect their mental health or wellbeing. The rationale behind this requirement is to ensure that patients can make fully informed decisions about their care. This means understanding not only the benefits of the recommended treatment but also the potential ramifications of refusing such treatment. By clearly communicating these risks, the mental health professional enables the client to weigh their options more effectively and make a choice that aligns with their personal health needs. In contrast, while the other choices may relate to aspects of therapy or treatment, they do not encompass the critical element of risk associated with non-compliance or refusal, which is particularly emphasized in the ruling of Truman v. Thomas. Therefore, understanding and articulating the risks tied to not following through with a suggested procedure is fundamental to the mental health professional's duty to their client.